This addresses the lack of an open standard for raw files created by individual camera models and ensures that photographers easily access their files. is excellent in this), on the single frame, help a lot.īUT I point out that these tests with TIFF weren't PRINTED in significant size.strip of an A4 home printing just to play.: I think the difference vs, working with Pano on DNGs would emerge with some well processed big print. Digital Negative (DNG) is a publicly available archival format for raw files which are generated by various digital cameras. ) : btw, some fine exposure adjustment with LR (that in my op. but the problem is no more the "blending" areas only. The first test I made with Autopano were right so: DNG>Lightroom>TIFF>Autopano.: it manages the blending, I'd say, perfectly if the exposure mismatches weren't significative (I made a stupid test with 2 images with one exposed 3 EV out. I have several displayed that are of conventional aspect ratio ( 9 X 3 frames shot vertically ), but always draw comments on thei sharpness and texture. I agree with those who commented that the most stunning quality of these pano's is the detail and color texture, even more than the aspect ratios. I was a professional long ago but that made no difference. I purchased it out of desperation since I could not find acceptable quality commercial printers that were willin to do business with an amateur. Unfortunately, after that nothing else fits in the basement. On my next road trip, I will shoot some pano's with my M8 and 35 summicron.Īt least my printing problrms are solved, I have an HP Z3100 in the basement. Has anyone there tried giving autopano such images as TIFF or JPG ?, if so. I do not know if autopano can correct exposure mismatches as well this way as with original raw images. I will try first converting Raw files to TIFF using the native converter, and then stitching the TIFF's with autopano. Leica images may work better because autopano first converts all raw to DNG and then uses DNG for the transforms. Extensive re-working in PS restored the image, but is a royal nuisance. I believe this is because Autopoano is not nearly as well calibrated for Nikon raw conversion as the Nikon utility (capture NX). The only problem I found, which is potentially serious in the workflow, is that the resulting images were initially flat and lifeless. I always use a nodal point tripod head array (Really Right Stuff), so did not test that correction. I have been testing with a set of 9 wide by 2 high pano's of the grand canyon using a Nikon D200, where while of course shooting fully manual, I accidently set bracketing on.Īutopano discovered the set directly from the NEF files, compensated exposure and color, and stitched perfectly. It is certainly easier,(than PS) and uses the raw files directly. I am currently testing autopano, having previously used photoshop for stitching.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |